Help is available by moving the cursor above any 
symbol or by checking MAQAO website.
[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (381.25 s)
To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.
[ 3 / 3 ] Optimization level option is correctly used
[ 2.40 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions compiled with -g
-g option gives access to debugging informations, such are source locations. Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to improve the accuracy of callchains found during the application profiling
[ 3 / 3 ] Architecture specific option -mcpu is used
[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0.33 % of the execution time)
To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (99.47%)
If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat
At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (77.59%), representing an hotspot for the application
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (86.67%)
If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations
It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations
[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (12.79%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (86.67%)
Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations
BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.
| Loop ID | Analysis | Penalty Score |
|---|---|---|
| ○Loop 11 - spmxv.exe | Execution Time: 77 % - Vectorization Ratio: 25.00 % - Vector Length Use: 31.25 % | |
| ►Loop 10 - spmxv.exe | Execution Time: 12 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 23.91 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 6 | |
| ○ | [SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points. | 4 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 16 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (10 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 10 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 14 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 16 | |
| ○ | [SA] Too many paths (10 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are 10 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each with a malus of 4 points. | 14 |
| ○ | [SA] Non innermost loop (InBetween) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ○Loop 13 - spmxv.exe | Execution Time: 9 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 25.00 % | |
| ○Loop 116 - spmxv.exe | Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 25.00 % | |
| ○Loop 7 - spmxv.exe | Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 85.71 % - Vector Length Use: 89.29 % | |
| ►Loop 117 - spmxv.exe | Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 23.52 % | |
| ►Loop Computation Issues | 2 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 |
| ►Control Flow Issues | 3 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 1 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each. | 1 |
| ○ | [SA] Several paths (2 paths) - Simplify control structure or force the compiler to use masked instructions. There are 2 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each. | 2 |
| ►Vectorization Roadblocks | 3 | |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 1 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each. | 1 |
| ○ | [SA] Several paths (2 paths) - Simplify control structure or force the compiler to use masked instructions. There are 2 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point each. | 2 |