********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2025.1.2 - a5bc9ffe18a557b734e9194b2a08753f23990eca::20250818-184816 || 2025/08/18
/home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao oneview --create-report=one --replace --run-directory=/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks --executable=bin/md-gcc-Ofast "--experiment-name=MD scalability Skylake GCC Ofast 2-52 threads runs, naive compute_forces() with code opts and alignment | Version : gcc-Ofast" --run-command= -c=/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/maqao_configs/md_multiruns_conf_skylake.json -WS --debug=1 -xp=/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/gcc/gcc-Ofast
CPY: [true] ./bin/md-gcc-Ofast --> /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/gcc/gcc-Ofast/binaries/md-gcc-Ofast
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/gcc/gcc-Ofast/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=2 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/gcc/gcc-Ofast/binaries/md-gcc-Ofast
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/gcc/gcc-Ofast/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=4 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/gcc/gcc-Ofast/binaries/md-gcc-Ofast
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/gcc/gcc-Ofast/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=8 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/gcc/gcc-Ofast/binaries/md-gcc-Ofast
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/gcc/gcc-Ofast/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=16 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/gcc/gcc-Ofast/binaries/md-gcc-Ofast
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=26 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/gcc/gcc-Ofast/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=26 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/gcc/gcc-Ofast/binaries/md-gcc-Ofast
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/gcc/gcc-Ofast/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=52 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/gcc/gcc-Ofast/binaries/md-gcc-Ofast
In run run_2_threads, 9 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0083193343743915% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
13 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0075831101130462% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_4_threads, 10 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0069474577976507% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00032771025871625% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_8_threads, 11 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.012508507039456% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00024647303507663% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_16_threads, 9 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0083277375597391% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00017845152615336% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_26_threads, 9 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0045893892893219% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00029046767303953% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_52_threads, 8 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0026055782072945% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00022175133926793% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
