********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2025.1.2 - a5bc9ffe18a557b734e9194b2a08753f23990eca::20250818-184816 || 2025/08/18
/home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao oneview --create-report=one --replace --run-directory=/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks --executable=bin/md-clang-O3-ffast-math "--experiment-name=MD scalability Skylake GCC Ofast 2-52 threads runs, naive compute_forces() with code opts and alignment | Version : clang-O3-ffast-math" --run-command= -c=/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/maqao_configs/md_multiruns_conf_skylake.json -WS --debug=1 -xp=/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/clang/clang-O3-ffast-math
CPY: [true] ./bin/md-clang-O3-ffast-math --> /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/clang/clang-O3-ffast-math/binaries/md-clang-O3-ffast-math
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/clang/clang-O3-ffast-math/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=2 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/clang/clang-O3-ffast-math/binaries/md-clang-O3-ffast-math
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/clang/clang-O3-ffast-math/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=4 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/clang/clang-O3-ffast-math/binaries/md-clang-O3-ffast-math
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/clang/clang-O3-ffast-math/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=8 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/clang/clang-O3-ffast-math/binaries/md-clang-O3-ffast-math
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/clang/clang-O3-ffast-math/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=16 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/clang/clang-O3-ffast-math/binaries/md-clang-O3-ffast-math
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=26 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/clang/clang-O3-ffast-math/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=26 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/clang/clang-O3-ffast-math/binaries/md-clang-O3-ffast-math
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/clang/clang-O3-ffast-math/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=52 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/naive_compute_forces/clang/clang-O3-ffast-math/binaries/md-clang-O3-ffast-math
In run run_2_threads, 13 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.031070555000042% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
14 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.008459804666927% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_4_threads, 13 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.019073111005127% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
6 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00068855995777995% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_8_threads, 12 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.020214413845679% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00025915916194208% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_16_threads, 15 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.020100031149923% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
1 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 6.2616920331493e-05% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_26_threads, 13 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0097143965831492% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00018329050362808% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_52_threads, 11 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0019225029755034% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
2 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00011651532986434% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
