********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2025.1.2 - a5bc9ffe18a557b734e9194b2a08753f23990eca::20250818-184816 || 2025/08/18
/home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao oneview --create-report=one --replace --run-directory=/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks --executable=bin/md-gcc-O3 "--experiment-name=MD scalability Skylake 2-52 threads runs | Version : gcc-O3" --run-command= -c=/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/maqao_configs/md_multiruns_conf_skylake.json -WS --debug=1 -xp=/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc-O3
CPY: [true] ./bin/md-gcc-O3 --> /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc-O3/binaries/md-gcc-O3
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc-O3/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=2 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc-O3/binaries/md-gcc-O3
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc-O3/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=4 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc-O3/binaries/md-gcc-O3
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc-O3/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=8 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc-O3/binaries/md-gcc-O3
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc-O3/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=16 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc-O3/binaries/md-gcc-O3
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=26 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc-O3/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=26 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc-O3/binaries/md-gcc-O3
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=52 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc-O3/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=52 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc-O3/binaries/md-gcc-O3
In run run_2_threads, 4 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0016628987359582% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
7 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0029932176694274% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_4_threads, 6 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0029350151598919% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
4 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00065222557168452% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_8_threads, 4 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0025208222068614% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00063020555535332% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_16_threads, 7 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0061923072207719% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
7 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0016613507177681% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_26_threads, 4 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.003015497000888% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00057438039220869% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_52_threads, 3 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.00038082827813922% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
7 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.001650255813729% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
