********************************************************************************
MAQAO 2025.1.2 - 3c12046452d68b38e394be5cd9e057265a89bbcf::20250812-175904 || 2025/08/12
/home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao oneview --create-report=one --replace --run-directory=/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks --executable=bin/md-gcc-Ofast "--experiment-name=MD Scalability Graviton 3 2-64 threads runs - Code Optimisations version | Version : gcc-Ofast" --run-command= -c=/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/maqao_configs/md_multiruns_conf_neoverse_v1.json -WS --debug=1 -xp=/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc/gcc-Ofast
CPY: [true] ./bin/md-gcc-Ofast --> /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc/gcc-Ofast/binaries/md-gcc-Ofast
CMD: OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_NUM_THREADS=2 OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc/gcc-Ofast/tools/lprof_npsu_run_0" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=2 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc/gcc-Ofast/binaries/md-gcc-Ofast
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=4 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc/gcc-Ofast/tools/lprof_npsu_run_1" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=4 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc/gcc-Ofast/binaries/md-gcc-Ofast
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=8 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc/gcc-Ofast/tools/lprof_npsu_run_2" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=8 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc/gcc-Ofast/binaries/md-gcc-Ofast
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc/gcc-Ofast/tools/lprof_npsu_run_3" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=16 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc/gcc-Ofast/binaries/md-gcc-Ofast
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=32 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc/gcc-Ofast/tools/lprof_npsu_run_4" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=32 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc/gcc-Ofast/binaries/md-gcc-Ofast
CMD: OMP_NUM_THREADS=64 OMP_PROC_BIND=close OMP_SCHEDULE=static OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_WAIT_POLICY=active /home/fmusial/MAQAO/bin/maqao lprof _caller=oneview --xp="/home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc/gcc-Ofast/tools/lprof_npsu_run_5" --mpi-command="" --collect-CPU-time-intervals --collect-topology tpp=64 -- /home/fmusial/MD_Benchmarks/results/scalability/gcc/gcc-Ofast/binaries/md-gcc-Ofast
In run run_2_threads, 5 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0040698362863623% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
8 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0061047545168549% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_4_threads, 7 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0063725211657583% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0024509696522727% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_8_threads, 7 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0052064599003643% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
3 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0018932581879198% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
In run run_16_threads, 6 loops were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0035669073113241% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
5 functions were discarded from static analysis because their coverage
are lower than object_coverage_threshold value (0.01%).
That represents 0.0022293170331977% of the execution time. To include them, change the value
in the experiment directory configuration file, then rerun the command with the additionnal parameter
--force-static-analysis
