options

mumps-parametrable-launcher - 2026-04-10 15:48:13 - MAQAO 2026.0.0

Help is available by moving the cursor above any symbol or by checking MAQAO website.

  • run_0
  • run_1
  • run_2
  • run_3
  • run_4
  • run_5
  • run_6
  • run_7

Stylizer  

[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (308.90 s)

To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.

[ 0 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions without compilation information

Functions without compilation information (typically not compiled with -g) cumulate 100.00% of the time spent in analyzed modules. Check that -g is present.
Remark: if -g is indeed used, this can also be due to some compiler built-in functions (typically math) or statically linked libraries. This warning can be ignored in that case.

[ 0 / 3 ] Some functions are compiled with a low optimization level (O0 or O1)

To have better performances, it is advised to help the compiler by using a proper optimization level (-O2 of higher). Warning, depending on compilers, faster optimization levels can decrease numeric accuracy.

[ 3 / 3 ] Host configuration allows retrieval of all necessary metrics.

[ 0 / 3 ] Compilation of some functions is not optimized for the target processor

Architecture specific options are needed to produce efficient code for a specific processor ( -x(target) or -ax(target) ).

[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 5.13 % of the execution time)

To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code

[ 1 / 1 ] Lstopo present. The Topology lstopo report will be generated.

Strategizer  

[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (31.69%)

If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 3 / 4 ] A significant amount of threads are idle (20.46%)

On average, more than 10% of observed threads are idle. Such threads are probably IO/sync waiting. Some hints: use faster filesystems to read/write data, improve parallel load balancing and/or scheduling.

[ 3 / 4 ] CPU activity is below 90% (79.55%)

CPU cores are idle more than 10% of time. Threads supposed to run on these cores are probably IO/sync waiting. Some hints: use faster filesystems to read/write data, improve parallel load balancing and/or scheduling.

[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat

At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (19.12%), representing an hotspot for the application

[ 0 / 4 ] Too little time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (12.34%)

If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 1 / 4 ] Affinity stability is lower than 90% (37.90%)

Threads are often migrating to other CPU cores/threads. For OpenMP, typically set (OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close) or (OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread). With OpenMPI + OpenMP, use --bind-to core --map-by node:PE=$OMP_NUM_THREADS --report-bindings. With IntelMPI + OpenMP, set I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=omp:compact or I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=omp:scatter and use -print-rank-map.

[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations

It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations

[ 0 / 3 ] Too many functions do not use all threads

Functions running on a reduced number of threads (typically sequential code) cover at least 10% of application walltime (10.12%). Check both "Max Inclusive Time Over Threads" and "Nb Threads" in Functions or Loops tabs and consider parallelizing sequential regions or improving parallelization of regions running on a reduced number of threads

[ 0 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (19.36%) greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage (12.34%)

Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations

BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)

Optimizer

Loop IDAnalysisPenalty Score
Loop 547 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 19 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Control Flow Issues+2
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Data Access Issues+6
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+8
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Loop 548 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 7 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 1765 - libdmumps.soExecution Time: 1 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop 1940 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 1 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 1.56 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Data Access Issues+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
Vectorization Roadblocks+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
Loop 552 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 9.17 %
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 854 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 10.27 %
Loop Computation Issues+2
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
Control Flow Issues+2
[SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 2 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each.2
Data Access Issues+2
[SA] More than 20% of the loads are accessing the stack - Perform loop splitting to decrease pressure on registers. This issue costs 2 points.2
Vectorization Roadblocks+2
[SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 2 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each.2
Loop 1936 - libdmumps.soExecution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop 1942 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 9.88 %
Control Flow Issues+1
[SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 1 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each.1
Data Access Issues+2
[SA] More than 20% of the loads are accessing the stack - Perform loop splitting to decrease pressure on registers. This issue costs 2 points.2
Vectorization Roadblocks+1001
[SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 1 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each.1
[SA] Too many paths (at least 1000 paths) - Simplify control structure. There are at least 1000 issues ( = paths) costing 1 point.1000
Loop 840 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 10.49 %
Control Flow Issues+1
[SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 1 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each.1
Data Access Issues+2
[SA] More than 20% of the loads are accessing the stack - Perform loop splitting to decrease pressure on registers. This issue costs 2 points.2
Vectorization Roadblocks+1
[SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 1 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each.1
Loop 1947 - libdmumps.soExecution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %

Stylizer  

[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (222.02 s)

To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.

[ 0 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions without compilation information

Functions without compilation information (typically not compiled with -g) cumulate 100.00% of the time spent in analyzed modules. Check that -g is present.
Remark: if -g is indeed used, this can also be due to some compiler built-in functions (typically math) or statically linked libraries. This warning can be ignored in that case.

[ 0 / 3 ] Some functions are compiled with a low optimization level (O0 or O1)

To have better performances, it is advised to help the compiler by using a proper optimization level (-O2 of higher). Warning, depending on compilers, faster optimization levels can decrease numeric accuracy.

[ 3 / 3 ] Host configuration allows retrieval of all necessary metrics.

[ 0 / 3 ] Compilation of some functions is not optimized for the target processor

Architecture specific options are needed to produce efficient code for a specific processor ( -x(target) or -ax(target) ).

[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 3.83 % of the execution time)

To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code

[ 1 / 1 ] Lstopo present. The Topology lstopo report will be generated.

Strategizer  

[ 0 / 4 ] Too little time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (28.52%)

If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 4 / 4 ] Threads activity is good

On average, more than 148.64% of observed threads are actually active

[ 3 / 4 ] CPU activity is below 90% (74.38%)

CPU cores are idle more than 10% of time. Threads supposed to run on these cores are probably IO/sync waiting. Some hints: use faster filesystems to read/write data, improve parallel load balancing and/or scheduling.

[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat

At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (11.32%), representing an hotspot for the application

[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (16.58%)

If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 1 / 4 ] Affinity stability is lower than 90% (39.87%)

Threads are often migrating to other CPU cores/threads. For OpenMP, typically set (OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close) or (OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread). With OpenMPI + OpenMP, use --bind-to core --map-by node:PE=$OMP_NUM_THREADS --report-bindings. With IntelMPI + OpenMP, set I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=omp:compact or I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=omp:scatter and use -print-rank-map.

[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations

It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations

[ 0 / 3 ] Too many functions do not use all threads

Functions running on a reduced number of threads (typically sequential code) cover at least 10% of application walltime (25.13%). Check both "Max Inclusive Time Over Threads" and "Nb Threads" in Functions or Loops tabs and consider parallelizing sequential regions or improving parallelization of regions running on a reduced number of threads

[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (11.93%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (16.58%)

Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations

BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)

Optimizer

Loop IDAnalysisPenalty Score
Loop 547 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 11 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Control Flow Issues+2
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Data Access Issues+6
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+8
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Loop 548 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 4 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 731 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 4 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop Computation Issues+4
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 1765 - libdmumps.soExecution Time: 1 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop 753 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 11.72 %
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 1940 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 1.56 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Data Access Issues+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
Vectorization Roadblocks+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
Loop 746 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Loop 740 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop Computation Issues+6
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
Data Access Issues+16
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 4 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.8
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 2 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.8
Vectorization Roadblocks+16
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 4 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.8
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 2 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.8
Loop 748 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Loop 730 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop Computation Issues+11
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+7
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+6
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2

Stylizer  

[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (215.57 s)

To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.

[ 0 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions without compilation information

Functions without compilation information (typically not compiled with -g) cumulate 100.00% of the time spent in analyzed modules. Check that -g is present.
Remark: if -g is indeed used, this can also be due to some compiler built-in functions (typically math) or statically linked libraries. This warning can be ignored in that case.

[ 0 / 3 ] Some functions are compiled with a low optimization level (O0 or O1)

To have better performances, it is advised to help the compiler by using a proper optimization level (-O2 of higher). Warning, depending on compilers, faster optimization levels can decrease numeric accuracy.

[ 3 / 3 ] Host configuration allows retrieval of all necessary metrics.

[ 0 / 3 ] Compilation of some functions is not optimized for the target processor

Architecture specific options are needed to produce efficient code for a specific processor ( -x(target) or -ax(target) ).

[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 2.17 % of the execution time)

To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code

[ 1 / 1 ] Lstopo present. The Topology lstopo report will be generated.

Strategizer  

[ 0 / 4 ] Too little time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (20.59%)

If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 4 / 4 ] Threads activity is good

On average, more than 267.06% of observed threads are actually active

[ 2 / 4 ] CPU activity is below 90% (66.83%)

CPU cores are idle more than 10% of time. Threads supposed to run on these cores are probably IO/sync waiting. Some hints: use faster filesystems to read/write data, improve parallel load balancing and/or scheduling.

[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat

At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (5.49%), representing an hotspot for the application

[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (15.38%)

If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 0 / 4 ] Affinity stability is lower than 90% (28.82%)

Threads are often migrating to other CPU cores/threads. For OpenMP, typically set (OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close) or (OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread). With OpenMPI + OpenMP, use --bind-to core --map-by node:PE=$OMP_NUM_THREADS --report-bindings. With IntelMPI + OpenMP, set I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=omp:compact or I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=omp:scatter and use -print-rank-map.

[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations

It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations

[ 0 / 3 ] Too many functions do not use all threads

Functions running on a reduced number of threads (typically sequential code) cover at least 10% of application walltime (12.80%). Check both "Max Inclusive Time Over Threads" and "Nb Threads" in Functions or Loops tabs and consider parallelizing sequential regions or improving parallelization of regions running on a reduced number of threads

[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (5.21%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (15.38%)

Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations

BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)

Optimizer

Loop IDAnalysisPenalty Score
Loop 731 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 5 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop Computation Issues+4
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 547 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 4 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Control Flow Issues+2
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Data Access Issues+6
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+8
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Loop 548 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 2 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 753 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 1 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 11.72 %
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 746 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 1 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Loop 885 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop Computation Issues+6
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
Data Access Issues+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
Vectorization Roadblocks+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
Loop 740 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop Computation Issues+6
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
Data Access Issues+16
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 4 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.8
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 2 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.8
Vectorization Roadblocks+16
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 4 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.8
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 2 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.8
Loop 1765 - libdmumps.soExecution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop 748 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Loop 730 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop Computation Issues+11
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+7
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+6
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2

Stylizer  

[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (221.76 s)

To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.

[ 0 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions without compilation information

Functions without compilation information (typically not compiled with -g) cumulate 100.00% of the time spent in analyzed modules. Check that -g is present.
Remark: if -g is indeed used, this can also be due to some compiler built-in functions (typically math) or statically linked libraries. This warning can be ignored in that case.

[ 0 / 3 ] Some functions are compiled with a low optimization level (O0 or O1)

To have better performances, it is advised to help the compiler by using a proper optimization level (-O2 of higher). Warning, depending on compilers, faster optimization levels can decrease numeric accuracy.

[ 3 / 3 ] Host configuration allows retrieval of all necessary metrics.

[ 0 / 3 ] Compilation of some functions is not optimized for the target processor

Architecture specific options are needed to produce efficient code for a specific processor ( -x(target) or -ax(target) ).

[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 1.19 % of the execution time)

To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code

[ 1 / 1 ] Lstopo present. The Topology lstopo report will be generated.

Strategizer  

[ 0 / 4 ] Too little time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (16.73%)

If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 4 / 4 ] Threads activity is good

On average, more than 487.91% of observed threads are actually active

[ 2 / 4 ] CPU activity is below 90% (61.05%)

CPU cores are idle more than 10% of time. Threads supposed to run on these cores are probably IO/sync waiting. Some hints: use faster filesystems to read/write data, improve parallel load balancing and/or scheduling.

[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat

At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (5.47%), representing an hotspot for the application

[ 0 / 4 ] Too little time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (14.58%)

If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 2 / 4 ] Affinity stability is lower than 90% (61.86%)

Threads are often migrating to other CPU cores/threads. For OpenMP, typically set (OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close) or (OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread). With OpenMPI + OpenMP, use --bind-to core --map-by node:PE=$OMP_NUM_THREADS --report-bindings. With IntelMPI + OpenMP, set I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=omp:compact or I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=omp:scatter and use -print-rank-map.

[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations

It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations

[ 0 / 3 ] Too many functions do not use all threads

Functions running on a reduced number of threads (typically sequential code) cover at least 10% of application walltime (13.06%). Check both "Max Inclusive Time Over Threads" and "Nb Threads" in Functions or Loops tabs and consider parallelizing sequential regions or improving parallelization of regions running on a reduced number of threads

[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (2.14%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (14.58%)

Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations

BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)

Optimizer

Loop IDAnalysisPenalty Score
Loop 731 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 5 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop Computation Issues+4
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 753 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 1 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 11.72 %
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 547 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 1 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Control Flow Issues+2
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Data Access Issues+6
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+8
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Loop 885 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 1 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop Computation Issues+6
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
Data Access Issues+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
Vectorization Roadblocks+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
Loop 548 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 1 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 746 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 1 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Loop 748 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Loop 740 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop Computation Issues+6
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
Data Access Issues+16
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 4 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.8
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 2 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.8
Vectorization Roadblocks+16
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 4 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.8
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 2 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.8
Loop 730 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop Computation Issues+11
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+7
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+6
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Loop 179 - libmumps_common.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Data Access Issues+6
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+6
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4

Stylizer  

[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (91.18 s)

To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.

[ 0 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions without compilation information

Functions without compilation information (typically not compiled with -g) cumulate 100.00% of the time spent in analyzed modules. Check that -g is present.
Remark: if -g is indeed used, this can also be due to some compiler built-in functions (typically math) or statically linked libraries. This warning can be ignored in that case.

[ 0 / 3 ] Some functions are compiled with a low optimization level (O0 or O1)

To have better performances, it is advised to help the compiler by using a proper optimization level (-O2 of higher). Warning, depending on compilers, faster optimization levels can decrease numeric accuracy.

[ 3 / 3 ] Host configuration allows retrieval of all necessary metrics.

[ 0 / 3 ] Compilation of some functions is not optimized for the target processor

Architecture specific options are needed to produce efficient code for a specific processor ( -x(target) or -ax(target) ).

[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 1.36 % of the execution time)

To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code

[ 1 / 1 ] Lstopo present. The Topology lstopo report will be generated.

Strategizer  

[ 0 / 4 ] Too little time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (12.35%)

If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 4 / 4 ] Threads activity is good

On average, more than 1018.81% of observed threads are actually active

[ 2 / 4 ] CPU activity is below 90% (63.83%)

CPU cores are idle more than 10% of time. Threads supposed to run on these cores are probably IO/sync waiting. Some hints: use faster filesystems to read/write data, improve parallel load balancing and/or scheduling.

[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat

At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (4.06%), representing an hotspot for the application

[ 0 / 4 ] Too little time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (10.62%)

If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 2 / 4 ] Affinity stability is lower than 90% (58.72%)

Threads are often migrating to other CPU cores/threads. For OpenMP, typically set (OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close) or (OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread). With OpenMPI + OpenMP, use --bind-to core --map-by node:PE=$OMP_NUM_THREADS --report-bindings. With IntelMPI + OpenMP, set I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=omp:compact or I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=omp:scatter and use -print-rank-map.

[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations

It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations

[ 0 / 3 ] Too many functions do not use all threads

Functions running on a reduced number of threads (typically sequential code) cover at least 10% of application walltime (30.45%). Check both "Max Inclusive Time Over Threads" and "Nb Threads" in Functions or Loops tabs and consider parallelizing sequential regions or improving parallelization of regions running on a reduced number of threads

[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (1.73%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (10.62%)

Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations

BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)

Optimizer

Loop IDAnalysisPenalty Score
Loop 731 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 4 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop Computation Issues+4
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 547 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 1 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Control Flow Issues+2
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Data Access Issues+6
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+8
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Loop 548 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 1 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 753 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 11.72 %
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 885 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop Computation Issues+6
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
Data Access Issues+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
Vectorization Roadblocks+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
Loop 746 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Loop 748 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Loop 730 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop Computation Issues+11
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+7
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+6
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Loop 179 - libmumps_common.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Data Access Issues+6
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+6
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 740 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop Computation Issues+6
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
Data Access Issues+16
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 4 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.8
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 2 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.8
Vectorization Roadblocks+16
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 4 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.8
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 2 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.8

Stylizer  

[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (48.01 s)

To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.

[ 0 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions without compilation information

Functions without compilation information (typically not compiled with -g) cumulate 100.00% of the time spent in analyzed modules. Check that -g is present.
Remark: if -g is indeed used, this can also be due to some compiler built-in functions (typically math) or statically linked libraries. This warning can be ignored in that case.

[ 0 / 3 ] Some functions are compiled with a low optimization level (O0 or O1)

To have better performances, it is advised to help the compiler by using a proper optimization level (-O2 of higher). Warning, depending on compilers, faster optimization levels can decrease numeric accuracy.

[ 3 / 3 ] Host configuration allows retrieval of all necessary metrics.

[ 0 / 3 ] Compilation of some functions is not optimized for the target processor

Architecture specific options are needed to produce efficient code for a specific processor ( -x(target) or -ax(target) ).

[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 2.89 % of the execution time)

To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code

[ 1 / 1 ] Lstopo present. The Topology lstopo report will be generated.

Strategizer  

[ 0 / 4 ] Too little time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (4.53%)

If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 4 / 4 ] Threads activity is good

On average, more than 1834.13% of observed threads are actually active

[ 2 / 4 ] CPU activity is below 90% (57.61%)

CPU cores are idle more than 10% of time. Threads supposed to run on these cores are probably IO/sync waiting. Some hints: use faster filesystems to read/write data, improve parallel load balancing and/or scheduling.

[ 0 / 4 ] Loop profile is flat

No hotspot found in the application (greatest loop coverage is 0.90%), and the twenty hottest loops cumulated coverage is lower than 20% of the application profiled time (4.03%)

[ 0 / 4 ] Too little time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (3.74%)

If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 2 / 4 ] Affinity stability is lower than 90% (62.15%)

Threads are often migrating to other CPU cores/threads. For OpenMP, typically set (OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close) or (OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread). With OpenMPI + OpenMP, use --bind-to core --map-by node:PE=$OMP_NUM_THREADS --report-bindings. With IntelMPI + OpenMP, set I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=omp:compact or I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=omp:scatter and use -print-rank-map.

[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations

It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations

[ 0 / 3 ] Too many functions do not use all threads

Functions running on a reduced number of threads (typically sequential code) cover at least 10% of application walltime (60.39%). Check both "Max Inclusive Time Over Threads" and "Nb Threads" in Functions or Loops tabs and consider parallelizing sequential regions or improving parallelization of regions running on a reduced number of threads

[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (0.79%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (3.74%)

Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations

BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)

Optimizer

Loop IDAnalysisPenalty Score
Loop 548 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 731 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop Computation Issues+4
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 547 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Control Flow Issues+2
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Data Access Issues+6
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+8
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Loop 1765 - libdmumps.soExecution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop 1940 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 1.56 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Data Access Issues+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
Vectorization Roadblocks+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
Loop 179 - libmumps_common.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Data Access Issues+6
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+6
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 1797 - libdmumps.soExecution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop 885 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop Computation Issues+6
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
Data Access Issues+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
Vectorization Roadblocks+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
Loop 753 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 11.72 %
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 740 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop Computation Issues+6
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
Data Access Issues+16
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 4 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.8
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 2 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.8
Vectorization Roadblocks+16
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 4 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.8
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 2 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.8

Stylizer  

[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (41.12 s)

To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.

[ 0 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions without compilation information

Functions without compilation information (typically not compiled with -g) cumulate 100.00% of the time spent in analyzed modules. Check that -g is present.
Remark: if -g is indeed used, this can also be due to some compiler built-in functions (typically math) or statically linked libraries. This warning can be ignored in that case.

[ 0 / 3 ] Some functions are compiled with a low optimization level (O0 or O1)

To have better performances, it is advised to help the compiler by using a proper optimization level (-O2 of higher). Warning, depending on compilers, faster optimization levels can decrease numeric accuracy.

[ 3 / 3 ] Host configuration allows retrieval of all necessary metrics.

[ 0 / 3 ] Compilation of some functions is not optimized for the target processor

Architecture specific options are needed to produce efficient code for a specific processor ( -x(target) or -ax(target) ).

[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0.91 % of the execution time)

To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code

[ 1 / 1 ] Lstopo present. The Topology lstopo report will be generated.

Strategizer  

[ 0 / 4 ] Too little time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (2.43%)

If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 4 / 4 ] Threads activity is good

On average, more than 3498.80% of observed threads are actually active

[ 2 / 4 ] CPU activity is below 90% (55.25%)

CPU cores are idle more than 10% of time. Threads supposed to run on these cores are probably IO/sync waiting. Some hints: use faster filesystems to read/write data, improve parallel load balancing and/or scheduling.

[ 0 / 4 ] Loop profile is flat

No hotspot found in the application (greatest loop coverage is 0.42%), and the twenty hottest loops cumulated coverage is lower than 20% of the application profiled time (2.08%)

[ 0 / 4 ] Too little time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (2.10%)

If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 3 / 4 ] Affinity stability is lower than 90% (74.65%)

Threads are often migrating to other CPU cores/threads. For OpenMP, typically set (OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close) or (OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread). With OpenMPI + OpenMP, use --bind-to core --map-by node:PE=$OMP_NUM_THREADS --report-bindings. With IntelMPI + OpenMP, set I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=omp:compact or I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=omp:scatter and use -print-rank-map.

[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations

It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations

[ 0 / 3 ] Too many functions do not use all threads

Functions running on a reduced number of threads (typically sequential code) cover at least 10% of application walltime (71.37%). Check both "Max Inclusive Time Over Threads" and "Nb Threads" in Functions or Loops tabs and consider parallelizing sequential regions or improving parallelization of regions running on a reduced number of threads

[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (0.33%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (2.10%)

Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations

BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)

Optimizer

Loop IDAnalysisPenalty Score
Loop 731 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop Computation Issues+4
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 548 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 547 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Control Flow Issues+2
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Data Access Issues+6
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+8
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Loop 1765 - libdmumps.soExecution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop 1797 - libdmumps.soExecution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop 1940 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 1.56 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Data Access Issues+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
Vectorization Roadblocks+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
Loop 885 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop Computation Issues+6
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
Data Access Issues+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
Vectorization Roadblocks+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
Loop 753 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 11.72 %
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 179 - libmumps_common.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Data Access Issues+6
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+6
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 1728 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 10.94 %
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 2 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 2 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.4

Stylizer  

[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (39.23 s)

To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.

[ 0 / 3 ] Most of time spent in analyzed modules comes from functions without compilation information

Functions without compilation information (typically not compiled with -g) cumulate 100.00% of the time spent in analyzed modules. Check that -g is present.
Remark: if -g is indeed used, this can also be due to some compiler built-in functions (typically math) or statically linked libraries. This warning can be ignored in that case.

[ 0 / 3 ] Some functions are compiled with a low optimization level (O0 or O1)

To have better performances, it is advised to help the compiler by using a proper optimization level (-O2 of higher). Warning, depending on compilers, faster optimization levels can decrease numeric accuracy.

[ 3 / 3 ] Host configuration allows retrieval of all necessary metrics.

[ 0 / 3 ] Compilation of some functions is not optimized for the target processor

Architecture specific options are needed to produce efficient code for a specific processor ( -x(target) or -ax(target) ).

[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 0.72 % of the execution time)

To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code

[ 1 / 1 ] Lstopo present. The Topology lstopo report will be generated.

Strategizer  

[ 0 / 4 ] Too little time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (1.75%)

If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 4 / 4 ] Threads activity is good

On average, more than 4573.77% of observed threads are actually active

[ 2 / 4 ] CPU activity is below 90% (53.88%)

CPU cores are idle more than 10% of time. Threads supposed to run on these cores are probably IO/sync waiting. Some hints: use faster filesystems to read/write data, improve parallel load balancing and/or scheduling.

[ 0 / 4 ] Loop profile is flat

No hotspot found in the application (greatest loop coverage is 0.29%), and the twenty hottest loops cumulated coverage is lower than 20% of the application profiled time (1.46%)

[ 0 / 4 ] Too little time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (1.54%)

If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.

[ 3 / 4 ] Affinity stability is lower than 90% (73.58%)

Threads are often migrating to other CPU cores/threads. For OpenMP, typically set (OMP_PLACES=cores OMP_PROC_BIND=close) or (OMP_PLACES=threads OMP_PROC_BIND=spread). With OpenMPI + OpenMP, use --bind-to core --map-by node:PE=$OMP_NUM_THREADS --report-bindings. With IntelMPI + OpenMP, set I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=omp:compact or I_MPI_PIN_DOMAIN=omp:scatter and use -print-rank-map.

[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS1 operations

It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations

[ 0 / 3 ] Too many functions do not use all threads

Functions running on a reduced number of threads (typically sequential code) cover at least 10% of application walltime (74.82%). Check both "Max Inclusive Time Over Threads" and "Nb Threads" in Functions or Loops tabs and consider parallelizing sequential regions or improving parallelization of regions running on a reduced number of threads

[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (0.21%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (1.54%)

Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in BLAS2 operations

BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.

[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0.00%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)

Optimizer

Loop IDAnalysisPenalty Score
Loop 548 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 731 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop Computation Issues+4
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 1765 - libdmumps.soExecution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop 547 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Control Flow Issues+2
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Data Access Issues+6
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+8
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
[SA] Non innermost loop (Outermost) - Collapse loop with innermost ones. This issue costs 2 points.2
Loop 1940 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 1.56 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Data Access Issues+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
Vectorization Roadblocks+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
Loop 1797 - libdmumps.soExecution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop 1728 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 10.94 %
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 2 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 2 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.4
Loop 179 - libmumps_common.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 6.25 %
Loop Computation Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Control Flow Issues+5
[SA] Peel/tail loop, considered having a low iteration count - Perform full unroll. Force compiler to use masked instructions. This issue costs 5 points.5
Data Access Issues+6
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+6
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
[SA] Presence of indirect accesses - Use array restructuring or gather instructions to lower the cost. There are 1 issues ( = indirect data accesses) costing 4 point each.4
Loop 1726 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Data Access Issues+4
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 2 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.4
Vectorization Roadblocks+4
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 2 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.4
Loop 885 - libdmumps.so+Execution Time: 0 % - Vectorization Ratio: 0.00 % - Vector Length Use: 12.50 %
Loop Computation Issues+6
[SA] Less than 10% of the FP ADD/SUB/MUL arithmetic operations are performed using FMA - Reorganize arithmetic expressions to exhibit potential for FMA. This issue costs 4 points.4
[SA] Presence of a large number of scalar integer instructions - Simplify loop structure, perform loop splitting or perform unroll and jam. This issue costs 2 points.2
Data Access Issues+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
Vectorization Roadblocks+2
[SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 1 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each.2
×