Help is available by moving the cursor above any 
symbol or by checking MAQAO website.
[ 4 / 4 ] Application profile is long enough (974.18 s)
To have good quality measurements, it is advised that the application profiling time is greater than 10 seconds.
[ 3 / 3 ] Optimization level option -O3 is used
To have better performances, it is advised to help the compiler by using a proper optimization level (-O3)
[ 3 / 3 ] Helper debug compilation options -g and -fno-omit-frame-pointer are used
-g option gives access to debugging informations, such are source locations and -fno-omit-frame-pointer improve the accuracy of callchains found during the application profiling.
[ 3 / 3 ] Architecture specific option -march=icelake-client is used
[ 2 / 2 ] Application is correctly profiled ("Others" category represents 4.13 % of the execution time)
To have a representative profiling, it is advised that the category "Others" represents less than 20% of the execution time in order to analyze as much as possible of the user code
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed loops (74.62%)
If the time spent in analyzed loops is less than 30%, standard loop optimizations will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 4 / 4 ] Loop profile is not flat
At least one loop coverage is greater than 4% (4.52%), representing an hotspot for the application
[ 4 / 4 ] Enough time of the experiment time spent in analyzed innermost loops (71.54%)
If the time spent in analyzed innermost loops is less than 15%, standard innermost loop optimizations such as vectorisation will have a limited impact on application performances.
[ 3 / 3 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in BLAS1 operations
It could be more efficient to inline by hand BLAS1 operations
[ 3 / 3 ] Cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage (3.08%) lower than cumulative innermost loop coverage (71.540000000001%)
Having cumulative Outermost/In between loops coverage greater than cumulative innermost loop coverage will make loop optimization more complex
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in Libm/SVML (special functions)
[ 2 / 2 ] Less than 10% (0%) is spend in BLAS2 operations
BLAS2 calls usually could make a poor cache usage and could benefit from inlining.
| Loop ID | Module | Analysis | Penalty Score | Coverage (%) | Vectorization Ratio (%) | Vector Length Use (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ►3212 | nemo-OMPI-INTEL.exe | Inefficient vectorization. | 64 | 4.52 | 100 | 50 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 32 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: more than 10% of the vector loads instructions are unaligned - When allocating arrays, don’t forget to align them. There are 14 issues ( = arrays) costing 2 points each | 28 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] More than 20% of the loads are accessing the stack - Perform loop splitting to decrease pressure on registers. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
| ►3190 | nemo-OMPI-INTEL.exe | Inefficient vectorization. | 64 | 4.17 | 100 | 50 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 32 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: more than 10% of the vector loads instructions are unaligned - When allocating arrays, don’t forget to align them. There are 14 issues ( = arrays) costing 2 points each | 28 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] More than 20% of the loads are accessing the stack - Perform loop splitting to decrease pressure on registers. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
| ►2287 | nemo-OMPI-INTEL.exe | Inefficient vectorization. | 64 | 4.15 | 100 | 50 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 8 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 32 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: more than 10% of the vector loads instructions are unaligned - When allocating arrays, don’t forget to align them. There are 12 issues ( = arrays) costing 2 points each | 24 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Presence of special instructions executing on a single port (BLEND/MERGE) - Simplify data access and try to get stride 1 access. There are 2 issues (= instructions) costing 1 point each. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] More than 20% of the loads are accessing the stack - Perform loop splitting to decrease pressure on registers. This issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of masked instructions - Simplify control structure. The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
| ►50349 | nemo-OMPI-INTEL.exe | Inefficient vectorization. | 2 | 2.34 | 100 | 50 |
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
| ►2242 | nemo-OMPI-INTEL.exe | Inefficient vectorization. | 43 | 2.12 | 100 | 50 |
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: more than 10% of the vector loads instructions are unaligned - When allocating arrays, don’t forget to align them. There are 11 issues ( = arrays) costing 2 points each | 22 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 4 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 16 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of masked instructions - Simplify control structure. The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Presence of special instructions executing on a single port (BLEND/MERGE) - Simplify data access and try to get stride 1 access. There are 1 issues (= instructions) costing 1 point each. | 1 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
| ►50348 | nemo-OMPI-INTEL.exe | Inefficient vectorization. | 2 | 1.97 | 100 | 50 |
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
| ►3200 | nemo-OMPI-INTEL.exe | Inefficient vectorization. | 34 | 1.67 | 100 | 50 |
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: more than 10% of the vector loads instructions are unaligned - When allocating arrays, don’t forget to align them. There are 8 issues ( = arrays) costing 2 points each | 16 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 4 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 16 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
| ►3160 | nemo-OMPI-INTEL.exe | Inefficient vectorization. | 84 | 1.54 | 100 | 50 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 16 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 64 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: more than 10% of the vector loads instructions are unaligned - When allocating arrays, don’t forget to align them. There are 9 issues ( = arrays) costing 2 points each | 18 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
| ►4043 | nemo-OMPI-INTEL.exe | Inefficient vectorization. | 38 | 1.51 | 100 | 50 |
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: more than 10% of the vector loads instructions are unaligned - When allocating arrays, don’t forget to align them. There are 10 issues ( = arrays) costing 2 points each | 20 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Presence of expensive FP instructions - Perform hoisting, change algorithm, use SVML or proper numerical library or perform value profiling (count the number of distinct input values). There are 4 issues (= instructions) costing 4 points each. | 16 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Inefficient vectorization: use of shorter than available vector length - Force compiler to use proper vector length. CAUTION: use of 512 bits vectors could be more expensive than 256 bits on some processors. Use intrinsics (costly and not portable). The issue costs 2 points. | 2 | ||||
| ○ | Warning! There is no dynamic data for this loop. Some checks can not been performed. | 0 | ||||
| ►27124 | nemo-OMPI-INTEL.exe | Partial or unexisting vectorization - Use pragma to force vectorization and check potential dependencies between array access. | 37 | 1.48 | 3.24 | 12.91 |
| ○ | [SA] Presence of constant non unit stride data access - Use array restructuring, perform loop interchange or use gather instructions to lower a bit the cost. There are 16 issues ( = data accesses) costing 2 point each. | 32 | ||||
| ○ | [SA] Presence of calls - Inline either by compiler or by hand and use SVML for libm calls. There are 5 issues (= calls) costing 1 point each. | 5 |